which best compares habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity?\nhabitat preservation usually…

which best compares habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity?\nhabitat preservation usually protects only individual species, while laws protect entire ecosystems.\nlaws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.\nonly habitat preservation has been shown to actually help protect biodiversity.\nonly laws have been shown to actually help protect biodiversity.

which best compares habitat preservation and laws that protect biodiversity?\nhabitat preservation usually protects only individual species, while laws protect entire ecosystems.\nlaws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.\nonly habitat preservation has been shown to actually help protect biodiversity.\nonly laws have been shown to actually help protect biodiversity.

Answer

Answer:

Laws usually protect only certain species, while habitat preservation protects entire ecosystems.

Brief Explanations:

Habitat preservation focuses on maintaining the natural environment (entire ecosystems) which supports multiple species. Laws often target specific species (e.g., endangered species acts) for protection. Both habitat preservation and laws can help protect biodiversity (so options stating only one helps are incorrect). And habitat preservation is about ecosystems, not just individual species (so the first option is wrong).