in a bird population, 50% of the individuals had white feathers, and 50% had colored feathers. over time, it…

in a bird population, 50% of the individuals had white feathers, and 50% had colored feathers. over time, it was observed that 98% of the population had colorful feathers. the rest had white feathers. how did the type of selection in this example affect the populations biodiversity?\ndirectional selection did not increase the populations biodiversity.\nstabilizing selection increased the populations biodiversity.\ndisruptive selection decreased the populations biodiversity.\necosystem selection did not increase the populations biodiversity.

in a bird population, 50% of the individuals had white feathers, and 50% had colored feathers. over time, it was observed that 98% of the population had colorful feathers. the rest had white feathers. how did the type of selection in this example affect the populations biodiversity?\ndirectional selection did not increase the populations biodiversity.\nstabilizing selection increased the populations biodiversity.\ndisruptive selection decreased the populations biodiversity.\necosystem selection did not increase the populations biodiversity.

Answer

Answer:

A. Directional selection did not increase the population's biodiversity.

Brief Explanations:

Initially, 50 - 50 split of white - colored feathers. Later, 98% have colorful feathers. This is directional selection (favoring one extreme), reducing biodiversity as one trait becomes dominant.