which facts can be used to argue against controlled burns? check all that apply.\nthe number of escaped…

which facts can be used to argue against controlled burns? check all that apply.\nthe number of escaped fires seems to be trending up.\nwe do not know how many of the “success” burns might have been near misses.\nthe estimated number of prescribed burns is 4,000 to 5,000 per year.\nthe report does not say how destructive the escaped fires were, only how many there were.\nthe report admits that prescribed burns have elements of risk and uncertainty.\none percent of the burns cannot be proven successful.

which facts can be used to argue against controlled burns? check all that apply.\nthe number of escaped fires seems to be trending up.\nwe do not know how many of the “success” burns might have been near misses.\nthe estimated number of prescribed burns is 4,000 to 5,000 per year.\nthe report does not say how destructive the escaped fires were, only how many there were.\nthe report admits that prescribed burns have elements of risk and uncertainty.\none percent of the burns cannot be proven successful.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  1. An upward - trending number of escaped fires suggests increased risk of uncontrolled blazes from controlled burns.
  2. Uncertainty about near - misses in "success" burns implies that the success rate may be overestimated.
  3. Lack of information on destructiveness of escaped fires makes it hard to assess the true impact.
  4. Acknowledgment of risk and uncertainty in prescribed burns is a negative factor.
  5. The inability to prove success for 1% of burns shows inefficiency.

Answer:

The number of escaped fires seems to be trending up. We do not know how many of the "success" burns might have been near misses. The report does not say how destructive the escaped fires were, only how many there were. The report admits that prescribed burns have elements of risk and uncertainty. One percent of the burns cannot be proven successful.