which of the following best explains why clear - cutting forests is more destructive than selectively…

which of the following best explains why clear - cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting down trees in forests?\na. clear - cutting eliminates all trees leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals.\nb. clear - cutting places the land at greater risk for wildfires.\nc. clear - cutting makes land more attractive for human development.\nd. clear - cutting causes less soil erosion than selective cutting.\nplease select the best answer from the choices provided\no a\no b\no c\no d

which of the following best explains why clear - cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting down trees in forests?\na. clear - cutting eliminates all trees leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals.\nb. clear - cutting places the land at greater risk for wildfires.\nc. clear - cutting makes land more attractive for human development.\nd. clear - cutting causes less soil erosion than selective cutting.\nplease select the best answer from the choices provided\no a\no b\no c\no d

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Clear - cutting removes all trees. Trees play crucial roles in maintaining soil fertility (through leaf - litter decomposition etc.) and providing habitats for native animals. Selective cutting leaves some trees intact, preserving these ecological functions. Wildfire risk isn't the main difference, and clear - cutting doesn't make land more attractive for development in an ecological sense. Also, clear - cutting causes more soil erosion as tree roots that hold soil in place are removed.

Answer:

A. Clear - cutting eliminates all trees leaving none behind to maintain soil fertility or house native animals.