given a map showing the distribution of ancient reptile fossils on different continents, how would you use…

given a map showing the distribution of ancient reptile fossils on different continents, how would you use this map to argue for the existence of pangaea? by showing that the same species are found on continents now separated by oceans, indicating they were once joined. by noting that reptiles can swim long distances. by focusing only on current animal distributions. by ignoring fossil evidence.

given a map showing the distribution of ancient reptile fossils on different continents, how would you use this map to argue for the existence of pangaea? by showing that the same species are found on continents now separated by oceans, indicating they were once joined. by noting that reptiles can swim long distances. by focusing only on current animal distributions. by ignoring fossil evidence.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The theory of Pangea posits that all continents were once a single land - mass. Fossils of the same ancient reptile species found on continents now separated by oceans support this as it implies these areas were once connected, allowing the species to inhabit them. Reptiles swimming long distances doesn't support Pangea as well; focusing on current animal distributions and ignoring fossil evidence are not relevant or valid ways to argue for Pangea.

Answer:

By showing that the same species are found on continents now separated by oceans, indicating they were once joined.