look at the maps. the top map shows carbon dioxide released by wildfires. the bottom map shows how the…

look at the maps. the top map shows carbon dioxide released by wildfires. the bottom map shows how the carbon dioxide would have been reduced by prescribed fires.\nin an essay that talks about ways to reduce carbon dioxide, these maps would most likely be used as \n○ evidence to support a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial.\n○ a rebuttal against a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial.\n○ evidence to support a counterclaim that prescribed fires are not a benefit.\n○ a rebuttal against a counterclaim that prescribed fires provide benefits.

look at the maps. the top map shows carbon dioxide released by wildfires. the bottom map shows how the carbon dioxide would have been reduced by prescribed fires.\nin an essay that talks about ways to reduce carbon dioxide, these maps would most likely be used as \n○ evidence to support a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial.\n○ a rebuttal against a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial.\n○ evidence to support a counterclaim that prescribed fires are not a benefit.\n○ a rebuttal against a counterclaim that prescribed fires provide benefits.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The top map shows CO₂ from wildfires, the bottom from prescribed fires (with less CO₂). To reduce CO₂, showing prescribed fires reduce it supports their benefit. A rebuttal would oppose, but here it's supporting. A counterclaim against benefit would need evidence against, but these show benefit. A rebuttal against benefit - claiming counterclaim would be opposing a negative view, but these support benefit. So the maps support prescribed fires are beneficial.

Answer:

A. evidence to support a claim that prescribed fires are beneficial.