which possible outcome below would not have supported the hypothesis? if generation 3 had 33% of all three…

which possible outcome below would not have supported the hypothesis? if generation 3 had 33% of all three birds if each bird ate only one type of food and not the other two if generation 3 had flock distributions similar to those shown in the graph below three foods two foods flock x flock y flock z

which possible outcome below would not have supported the hypothesis? if generation 3 had 33% of all three birds if each bird ate only one type of food and not the other two if generation 3 had flock distributions similar to those shown in the graph below three foods two foods flock x flock y flock z

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The hypothesis likely involves natural - selection and adaptation of beak types to food availability. If each bird ate only one type of food and not the other two, it doesn't show the relationship between beak type adaptation and food availability as strongly as the other options. The other options show distribution changes related to food availability which could support the hypothesis.

Answer:

if each bird ate only one type of food and not the other two