a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist…

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\nstrong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nweak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nstrong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\nweak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\nstrong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nweak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nstrong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\nweak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Evolution theory posits that closely - related organisms share a more recent common ancestor and thus have stronger genetic similarities, while distantly - related organisms have weaker genetic similarities. To disprove evolution with DNA evidence, one would need to show the opposite: weak genetic similarities in closely - related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly - related organisms. Physical similarities are not the key DNA - based evidence here.

Answer:

Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.