a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist…

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\no strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\no weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\no strong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\no weak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\no strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\no weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\no strong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\no weak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

Answer

Answer:

B. Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.

Brief Explanations:

La evolución se basa en la idea de que los organismos estrechamente relacionados comparten más similitudes genéticas debido a un ancestro común reciente. Si se encontrara lo contrario (similitudes débiles en organismos estrechamente relacionados y fuertes en organismos distantes), desafiaría la teoría de la evolución. Las similitudes físicas son menos concluyentes que las genéticas en este contexto.