a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist…

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\n\nstrong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nweak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nstrong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\nweak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\n\nstrong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nweak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\nstrong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\nweak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Evolution is supported by the idea that closely - related organisms have strong genetic similarities and distantly - related organisms have weak genetic similarities. To prove evolution does not exist, the opposite would need to be true. Physical similarities are not as conclusive as genetic evidence in this context.

Answer:

Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.