a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist…

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\n- strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\n- weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\n- strong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\n- weak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

a scientist makes the argument that she has found dna evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. what would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?\n- strong genetic similarities in closely related organisms and weak genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\n- weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.\n- strong physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.\n- weak physical similarities among closely related organisms and also among distantly related organisms.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Evolution is supported by the idea that closely - related organisms have more genetic similarities due to a recent common ancestor, and distantly - related organisms have fewer genetic similarities. To disprove evolution, the opposite would need to be shown, i.e., weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.

Answer:

Weak genetic similarities in closely related organisms and strong genetic similarities in distantly related organisms.