select the best evidence to support the statement that the fda ban on small turtles was intended to protect…

select the best evidence to support the statement that the fda ban on small turtles was intended to protect small children.\n\nturtles and other reptiles often carry a germ called salmonella, but appear perfectly healthy and clean. people think salmonella infections are caused only by contaminated food, but these germs can also be caught by touching animals, including reptiles or amphibians, such as frogs....\n\nsince 1975, it has been illegal in the united states to sell or distribute small turtles with shells that measure less than 4 inches in length. this size was chosen because young children are more likely to treat smaller turtles as toys and put them in their mouths. this ban, enforced by the u.s. food and drug administration, likely remains the most effective public health action to prevent salmonella infections associated with turtles.\n\nfrom centers for disease control and prevention, \turtles and other reptiles are risky pets.\

select the best evidence to support the statement that the fda ban on small turtles was intended to protect small children.\n\nturtles and other reptiles often carry a germ called salmonella, but appear perfectly healthy and clean. people think salmonella infections are caused only by contaminated food, but these germs can also be caught by touching animals, including reptiles or amphibians, such as frogs....\n\nsince 1975, it has been illegal in the united states to sell or distribute small turtles with shells that measure less than 4 inches in length. this size was chosen because young children are more likely to treat smaller turtles as toys and put them in their mouths. this ban, enforced by the u.s. food and drug administration, likely remains the most effective public health action to prevent salmonella infections associated with turtles.\n\nfrom centers for disease control and prevention, \turtles and other reptiles are risky pets.\

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To support the statement that the FDA ban on small turtles was to protect small children, we analyze the text. The key evidence is in the second paragraph: it states the 4 - inch shell size ban was chosen because young children are more likely to treat smaller turtles as toys and put them in their mouths, and the ban prevents Salmonella infections from turtles (which carry the germ, as per the first paragraph). This directly links the ban to protecting children from Salmonella by addressing their behavior with small turtles.

Answer:

The relevant evidence is: "Since 1975, it has been illegal in the United States to sell or distribute small turtles with shells that measure less than 4 inches in length. This size was chosen because young children are more likely to treat smaller turtles as toys and put them in their mouths. This ban, enforced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, likely remains the most effective public health action to prevent Salmonella infections associated with turtles." (along with the context from the first paragraph about turtles carrying Salmonella that can be transmitted by touch, including when children put turtles in their mouths)