if we wanted to compare muscular endurance between a very large person and a very small person, what method…

if we wanted to compare muscular endurance between a very large person and a very small person, what method would be the best method to use?\na. absolute method\nb. maxing out\nc. callisthenic method\nd. fixed percentage of rm method

if we wanted to compare muscular endurance between a very large person and a very small person, what method would be the best method to use?\na. absolute method\nb. maxing out\nc. callisthenic method\nd. fixed percentage of rm method

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • The absolute method measures strength without considering body size, which is not ideal for comparing a large and small person.
  • Maxing out measures one - rep maximum, which is more about strength than endurance.
  • The callisthenic method uses bodyweight exercises, but bodyweight differs greatly between a large and small person.
  • The fixed percentage of RM (Repetition Maximum) method adjusts for individual strength levels (by using a percentage of their own RM). This allows for a fair comparison of muscular endurance between a very large and a very small person as it accounts for their relative strength capabilities.

Answer:

D. fixed percentage of RM method