compared to absolute dating, what is an advantage of relative dating?\no a single fossil can be dated by…

compared to absolute dating, what is an advantage of relative dating?\no a single fossil can be dated by itself.\no the actual age of a fossil can be determined.\no fossils do not need to be arranged in different layers of rock.\no there is no limit to the age range of the fossils being dated.

compared to absolute dating, what is an advantage of relative dating?\no a single fossil can be dated by itself.\no the actual age of a fossil can be determined.\no fossils do not need to be arranged in different layers of rock.\no there is no limit to the age range of the fossils being dated.

Answer

Answer:

D. There is no limit to the age range of the fossils being dated.

Brief Explanations:

  • Absolute dating has limitations on the age range (e.g., radiocarbon dating is only useful for relatively recent organic materials).
  • Relative dating, such as stratigraphic correlation, can be used for fossils of any age range as it is based on the order of rock layers.
  • Option A is incorrect because relative dating usually relies on the position of a fossil in a sequence (related to other fossils or layers), not just a single fossil itself.
  • Option B is incorrect as relative dating gives an age in relation to other fossils/layers (e.g., older/younger), not the actual numerical age like absolute dating.
  • Option C is incorrect because relative dating often uses the principle of superposition (fossils in lower rock layers are generally older) so arranging fossils in rock layers is relevant.