which best explains the difference between a ball - and - stick model of a chemical compound and a space…

which best explains the difference between a ball - and - stick model of a chemical compound and a space - filling model?\no ball - and - stick models can show compounds in three dimensions, but space - filling models cannot.\no space - filling models can show compounds in three dimensions, but ball - and - stick models cannot.\no ball - and - stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. space - filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.\no space - filling models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. ball - and - stick models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.

which best explains the difference between a ball - and - stick model of a chemical compound and a space - filling model?\no ball - and - stick models can show compounds in three dimensions, but space - filling models cannot.\no space - filling models can show compounds in three dimensions, but ball - and - stick models cannot.\no ball - and - stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. space - filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.\no space - filling models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. ball - and - stick models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Ball - and - stick models use balls for atoms and sticks for bonds, emphasizing bonds but not relative atom sizes well. Space - filling models represent atoms as spheres and show relative sizes, but bonds are less obvious.

Answer:

Ball - and - stick models show the bonds between atoms, but not the relative sizes of atoms. Space - filling models show the relative sizes of atoms, but not the bonds between atoms.