the seafoam island scientists considered multiple costs to test the council treasurers requirement:\nthe…

the seafoam island scientists considered multiple costs to test the council treasurers requirement:\nthe solution cannot cost more than $250,000 per year.\nthe no - anchor zone costs $280,000 per year. the mooring buoys cost $311,000 in the first year, and then $251,000 per year after that.\nwhich of the two solutions meets the council treasurers requirement?\nthe no - anchor zone meets the requirement, but mooring buoys do not.\nthe mooring buoys meet the requirement, but the no - anchor zone does not.\nboth solutions meet the requirement.\nneither solution meets the requirement.

the seafoam island scientists considered multiple costs to test the council treasurers requirement:\nthe solution cannot cost more than $250,000 per year.\nthe no - anchor zone costs $280,000 per year. the mooring buoys cost $311,000 in the first year, and then $251,000 per year after that.\nwhich of the two solutions meets the council treasurers requirement?\nthe no - anchor zone meets the requirement, but mooring buoys do not.\nthe mooring buoys meet the requirement, but the no - anchor zone does not.\nboth solutions meet the requirement.\nneither solution meets the requirement.

Answer

Explanation:

Step1: Compare no - anchor zone cost

The cost of the no - anchor zone is $280,000 per year. Since $280,000>250,000, it does not meet the requirement.

Step2: Compare mooring buoys cost

The cost of mooring buoys in the first year is $311,000 which is $311,000>250,000. After the first year, the cost is $251,000 per year which is also $251,000>250,000. So it does not meet the requirement.

Answer:

Neither solution meets the requirement.