which of these best explains the stance of the anti-imperialist league? (1 point) expansionism reduced…

Answer:

Expansionism was antidemocratic and anticompetitive.

Brief Explanations:

The Anti - Imperialist League opposed U.S. expansion overseas. They believed that taking over other territories (expansionism) went against democratic principles (as it often involved ruling over people without their consent) and was anticompetitive (as it might create monopolistic or unfair economic situations in trade and resource acquisition). Expansionism did not reduce immigration (it could actually increase interactions and movement), it did not violate the Treaty of Paris (the Treaty of Paris was more about ending the Spanish - American War and ceding territories like Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines to the U.S., which the Anti - Imperialist League opposed on principle, not because of a treaty violation in the sense of breaking the treaty's terms). And they definitely did not see expansionism as a way for America to defend itself.