consider this claim: when a book is made into a movie, you should read the book before seeing the movie. now…

consider this claim: when a book is made into a movie, you should read the book before seeing the movie. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents a counter - claim to the above claim? its a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple hours. books typically include more details about the characters and plot of a story than movie versions.

consider this claim: when a book is made into a movie, you should read the book before seeing the movie. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents a counter - claim to the above claim? its a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple hours. books typically include more details about the characters and plot of a story than movie versions.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

A counter - claim opposes the original claim. The original claim is that one should read the book before seeing the movie. The statement "It's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple hours" opposes this by suggesting reading the book is not necessary. The second statement supports reading the book first as it mentions books have more details.

Answer:

It's a waste of time to read a book when you can see the movie in a couple hours.