which excerpt from winona ladukes \a case for waawaatesi\ best appeals to readers logic?\nevery year…

which excerpt from winona ladukes \a case for waawaatesi\ best appeals to readers logic?\nevery year millions of birds die colliding with needlessly illuminated buildings and towers.\nnocturnal animals sleep during the day and are active at night. light pollution radically alters their world by turning night into day.\nits things like frogs, who make it their business to croak at night, particularly when mating. artificial lights disrupt their mojo and that means less frogs and reduced populations.\nthink of it this way, your ancestors navigated by the stars, and today most people wont walk outside without a gps. thats a crazy loss of direction or skill at some level for sure.

which excerpt from winona ladukes \a case for waawaatesi\ best appeals to readers logic?\nevery year millions of birds die colliding with needlessly illuminated buildings and towers.\nnocturnal animals sleep during the day and are active at night. light pollution radically alters their world by turning night into day.\nits things like frogs, who make it their business to croak at night, particularly when mating. artificial lights disrupt their mojo and that means less frogs and reduced populations.\nthink of it this way, your ancestors navigated by the stars, and today most people wont walk outside without a gps. thats a crazy loss of direction or skill at some level for sure.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first option presents a factual statement about the number of birds dying due to needlessly illuminated buildings, which is a logical appeal based on a real - world consequence. The other options are more anecdotal or make connections that are less directly logical in terms of presenting a clear - cut cause - and - effect based on hard facts.

Answer:

Every year millions of birds die colliding with needlessly illuminated buildings and towers.