which explains the difference between fascism in italy and militarism in japan?\n mussolini seized power in…

which explains the difference between fascism in italy and militarism in japan?\n mussolini seized power in italy with support of the blackshirts, while military leaders took control of japan and conscripted men over twenty years old.\n military leaders seized control of italy and conscripted men over twenty years old, while mussolini took control of japan with support of the blackshirts.\n mussolini seized power in italy and invaded manchuria, while military leaders took control of japan and invaded libya.\n military leaders seized control of italy and invaded china, while mussolini took control of japan and invaded ethiopia.

which explains the difference between fascism in italy and militarism in japan?\n mussolini seized power in italy with support of the blackshirts, while military leaders took control of japan and conscripted men over twenty years old.\n military leaders seized control of italy and conscripted men over twenty years old, while mussolini took control of japan with support of the blackshirts.\n mussolini seized power in italy and invaded manchuria, while military leaders took control of japan and invaded libya.\n military leaders seized control of italy and invaded china, while mussolini took control of japan and invaded ethiopia.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Mussolini, with the Blackshirts' support, came to power in Italy. In Japan, military leaders took control and implemented conscription of men over twenty - years - old. This accurately differentiates the rise of fascism in Italy and militarism in Japan. The other options have incorrect attributions of who took power and what invasions occurred. For example, it was Japan that invaded Manchuria, not Italy, and it was Italy that invaded Ethiopia, not Japan.

Answer:

A. Mussolini seized power in Italy with support of the Blackshirts, while military leaders took control of Japan and conscripted men over twenty years old.