which of the following statements are supported by the information in the text? the scientists were in…

which of the following statements are supported by the information in the text? the scientists were in agreement on their position regarding the use of the bomb. the scientists felt that saving american lives had to take priority in the war. no scientist believed that the use of atomic weapons in warfare should be outlawed. most of the scientists believed using the bomb to force a surrender was the only option. you have asked us to comment on the initial use of the new weapon.... we recognize our obligation to our nation to use the weapons to help save american lives in the japanese war. the opinions of our scientific colleagues on the initial use of these weapons are not unanimous: they range from the proposal of a purely technical demonstration to that of the military application best designed to induce surrender. those who advocate a purely technical demonstration would wish to outlaw the use of atomic weapons, and have feared that if we use the weapons now our

which of the following statements are supported by the information in the text? the scientists were in agreement on their position regarding the use of the bomb. the scientists felt that saving american lives had to take priority in the war. no scientist believed that the use of atomic weapons in warfare should be outlawed. most of the scientists believed using the bomb to force a surrender was the only option. you have asked us to comment on the initial use of the new weapon.... we recognize our obligation to our nation to use the weapons to help save american lives in the japanese war. the opinions of our scientific colleagues on the initial use of these weapons are not unanimous: they range from the proposal of a purely technical demonstration to that of the military application best designed to induce surrender. those who advocate a purely technical demonstration would wish to outlaw the use of atomic weapons, and have feared that if we use the weapons now our

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • The text states that the scientists recognized their obligation to use the weapons to save American lives, which supports the statement that saving American lives had to take priority.
  • The text also mentions that opinions were not unanimous, so the statement about scientists being in agreement is incorrect.
  • There were scientists who advocated for a technical demonstration and outlawing the use, so the statement about no scientist believing in outlawing is wrong.
  • The text does not say that most believed it was the only option.

Answer:

The scientists felt that saving American lives had to take priority in the war.