read the claim below.\nthe national hockey league should ban fighting among players.\nselect the piece of…

read the claim below.\nthe national hockey league should ban fighting among players.\nselect the piece of evidence that best supports this claim.\nprofessional hockey players are already subject to penalties for fighting.\nhockey players may suffer head trauma and other serious injuries during fights.\na recent study examined nearly seven thousand hockey games to find out why fights break out.

read the claim below.\nthe national hockey league should ban fighting among players.\nselect the piece of evidence that best supports this claim.\nprofessional hockey players are already subject to penalties for fighting.\nhockey players may suffer head trauma and other serious injuries during fights.\na recent study examined nearly seven thousand hockey games to find out why fights break out.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To support the claim that the NHL should ban fighting, we need evidence showing a negative consequence of fighting. The first option talks about existing penalties (not a reason to ban), the third is about why fights break out (not a reason to ban). The second option, stating players suffer serious injuries like head trauma during fights, gives a strong reason to ban fighting as it highlights harm.

Answer:

Hockey players may suffer head trauma and other serious injuries during fights.