how were the results of the big stick policy, dollar diplomacy, and moral diplomacy similar in latin…

how were the results of the big stick policy, dollar diplomacy, and moral diplomacy similar in latin america?\npeople in latin america were inspired to create stronger democracies.\npeople in latin america celebrated that the us never sent troops into their region.\npeople in latin america were angry at us actions taken in various countries.\npeople in latin america hoped their governments would declare war on the us.

how were the results of the big stick policy, dollar diplomacy, and moral diplomacy similar in latin america?\npeople in latin america were inspired to create stronger democracies.\npeople in latin america celebrated that the us never sent troops into their region.\npeople in latin america were angry at us actions taken in various countries.\npeople in latin america hoped their governments would declare war on the us.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The Big Stick policy (Roosevelt), Dollar Diplomacy (Taft), and Moral Diplomacy (Wilson) were all forms of U.S. intervention in Latin America. The Big Stick policy used military threat, Dollar Diplomacy economic influence (investments to control), and Moral Diplomacy claimed to promote democracy but still intervened. Such interventions were seen as outside interference by Latin - American people. They resented U.S. actions like military landings (under Big Stick, e.g., in Dominican Republic), economic domination (Dollar Diplomacy), and what they perceived as false - pretenses of democracy promotion (Moral Diplomacy).

Answer:

People in Latin America were angry at US actions taken in various countries.