which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in \dylans nobel prize settles…

which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in \dylans nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry\?\ndeluca shows an impressive knowledge of the entire range of dylans creative output.\noverall, delucas wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.\ni find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers.\ndeluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committees decision.

which statement would best conclude an evaluation of dan delucas argument in \dylans nobel prize settles debate: rock lyrics are poetry\?\ndeluca shows an impressive knowledge of the entire range of dylans creative output.\noverall, delucas wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.\ni find the examples of internal rhyme to be the most convincing evidence deluca offers.\ndeluca calls on novelists and a us president for their opinions of the nobel committees decision.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To conclude an evaluation of an argument, a statement should summarize the overall strength of the argument. The second option does this by stating that DeLuca's wide - ranging evidence proves his point. The first option just notes knowledge, the third is a personal opinion on one piece of evidence, and the fourth is about who he cited, not the overall argument.

Answer:

Overall, DeLuca’s wide - ranging evidence will prove that rock lyrics are indeed poetry.