tecumseh argues that native american chiefs who sell land are causing harm to their people. how effective is…

tecumseh argues that native american chiefs who sell land are causing harm to their people. how effective is this point of view to the overall argument? (ri.8)\na it is effective because it shifts responsibility onto the leaders who act against the interests of all tribes.\nb it is ineffective because it dismisses the independence of individual chiefs.\nc it is effective because it emphasizes the moral responsibility of chiefs to protect the land for all tribes.\nd it is ineffective because it oversimplifies the complex issues surrounding land sales.

tecumseh argues that native american chiefs who sell land are causing harm to their people. how effective is this point of view to the overall argument? (ri.8)\na it is effective because it shifts responsibility onto the leaders who act against the interests of all tribes.\nb it is ineffective because it dismisses the independence of individual chiefs.\nc it is effective because it emphasizes the moral responsibility of chiefs to protect the land for all tribes.\nd it is ineffective because it oversimplifies the complex issues surrounding land sales.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Tecumseh's view emphasizes the moral duty of chiefs to safeguard land for all tribes. Shifting blame to leaders acting against tribal interests and highlighting this moral responsibility strengthens his overall argument. It doesn't overly dismiss chief independence or oversimplify land - sale issues.

Answer:

C. It is effective because it emphasizes the moral responsibility of chiefs to protect the land for all tribes.