drag each statement under the selection it describes.\nthe automation paradox\tboth\theads up…

drag each statement under the selection it describes.\nthe automation paradox\tboth\theads up, humans\n\nprimarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased unemployment in many professions\n\nprimarily uses examples to show how computers have improved the workplace\n\nuses quotations from experts to support their claim

drag each statement under the selection it describes.\nthe automation paradox\tboth\theads up, humans\n\nprimarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased unemployment in many professions\n\nprimarily uses examples to show how computers have improved the workplace\n\nuses quotations from experts to support their claim

Answer

Brief Explanations:

To solve this drag - and - drop problem, we analyze each statement:

  1. For the statement "Primarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased unemployment in many professions", we match it with "The Automation Paradox" as this title implies a focus on the negative impact (unemployment) of automation (computer - related) and using statistics is a likely approach for such an analysis.

  2. The statement "Primarily uses examples to show how computers have improved the workplace" is matched with "Heads Up, Humans" because this title suggests a more positive outlook on the human - computer workplace relationship, and using examples to show improvement fits.

  3. The statement "Uses quotations from experts to support their claim" is matched with "Both" as both articles (implied by the two main titles) could potentially use expert quotations to support their respective claims about the impact of computers in the workplace.

Answer:

  • "Primarily uses statistics to show how computers have increased unemployment in many professions" → The Automation Paradox
  • "Primarily uses examples to show how computers have improved the workplace" → Heads Up, Humans
  • "Uses quotations from experts to support their claim" → Both