a scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on\n○…

a scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on\n○ inconsistent data.\n○ independent data.\n○ unlimited results.\n○ controlled results.

a scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on\n○ inconsistent data.\n○ independent data.\n○ unlimited results.\n○ controlled results.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In science, inconsistent data cannot reliably support an argument. Independent data can be valid, unlimited results may not necessarily invalidate an argument, and controlled results are often desirable for valid arguments.

Answer:

A. inconsistent data