in this excerpt from the story of stuff, author annie leonard discusses factors that may impact the actions…

in this excerpt from the story of stuff, author annie leonard discusses factors that may impact the actions of corporations. i know that many people within corporations do care about the planet and people and are working to lessen their companys impact. some are going further, striving to be a force for positive change. unfortunately though, there are some structural aspects of corporations that make them less than ideal neighbors—or planet—mates. first, some have gotten so big and powerful that they have disproportionately large influence and impact, increasingly overwhelming the democratic process. of the hundred largest economies in the world, over half are corporations—ahead of most countries. when corporations control such a huge percentage of global resources. its pretty hard to rein them in when they start trashing the planet, as far too many do. in 2007, the 60,000 - plus multinational corporations controlled half the worlds oil, gas, and coal and generated half the gasses responsible for global warming. in the united states, corporations are legally beholden above all else to make profit for their shareholders. so entities with a number one goal of short - term profit control much of the worlds energy resources, the unbridled use of which is throwing our entire global climate into disarray. how does the underlined sentence support leonards purpose? choose 1 answer: a it contradicts leonards primary point that corporations are neither inherently good nor evil. b it supports leonards argument that corporations should invest more heavily in environmentally - friendly technologies. c it describes why corporations have often worked in ways that have significant environmental costs. d it indicates that corporations are required to follow the environmental laws of the united states.

in this excerpt from the story of stuff, author annie leonard discusses factors that may impact the actions of corporations. i know that many people within corporations do care about the planet and people and are working to lessen their companys impact. some are going further, striving to be a force for positive change. unfortunately though, there are some structural aspects of corporations that make them less than ideal neighbors—or planet—mates. first, some have gotten so big and powerful that they have disproportionately large influence and impact, increasingly overwhelming the democratic process. of the hundred largest economies in the world, over half are corporations—ahead of most countries. when corporations control such a huge percentage of global resources. its pretty hard to rein them in when they start trashing the planet, as far too many do. in 2007, the 60,000 - plus multinational corporations controlled half the worlds oil, gas, and coal and generated half the gasses responsible for global warming. in the united states, corporations are legally beholden above all else to make profit for their shareholders. so entities with a number one goal of short - term profit control much of the worlds energy resources, the unbridled use of which is throwing our entire global climate into disarray. how does the underlined sentence support leonards purpose? choose 1 answer: a it contradicts leonards primary point that corporations are neither inherently good nor evil. b it supports leonards argument that corporations should invest more heavily in environmentally - friendly technologies. c it describes why corporations have often worked in ways that have significant environmental costs. d it indicates that corporations are required to follow the environmental laws of the united states.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Leonard argues that some structural aspects of corporations harm the environment. The under - lined sentence shows that US corporations' legal obligation to make profit for shareholders leads to their unbridled use of energy resources, causing environmental problems. This describes why corporations often have significant environmental costs.

Answer:

C. It describes why corporations have often worked in ways that have significant environmental costs.