from the table below, compare the coefficients for static and kinetic friction.\napproximate coefficients of…

from the table below, compare the coefficients for static and kinetic friction.\napproximate coefficients of friction\n| | kinetic | static |\n|--|--|--|\n| rubber on concrete (dry) | 0.68 | 0.90 |\n| rubber on concrete (wet) | 0.58 | |\n| rubber on asphalt (dry) | 0.67 | 0.85 |\n| rubber on asphalt (wet) | 0.53 | |\n| rubber on ice | 0.15 | 0.14 |\n| waxed ski on snow | 0.05 | 0.14 |\n| wood on wood | 0.30 | 0.42 |\n| steel on steel | 0.57 | 0.74 |\n| copper on steel | 0.36 | 0.53 |\n| teflon on teflon | 0.04 | |\nthe coefficient for static friction is always less than for kinetic friction\nthey are the same for all materials\nthe coefficient for static friction is always greater than for kinetic friction

from the table below, compare the coefficients for static and kinetic friction.\napproximate coefficients of friction\n| | kinetic | static |\n|--|--|--|\n| rubber on concrete (dry) | 0.68 | 0.90 |\n| rubber on concrete (wet) | 0.58 | |\n| rubber on asphalt (dry) | 0.67 | 0.85 |\n| rubber on asphalt (wet) | 0.53 | |\n| rubber on ice | 0.15 | 0.14 |\n| waxed ski on snow | 0.05 | 0.14 |\n| wood on wood | 0.30 | 0.42 |\n| steel on steel | 0.57 | 0.74 |\n| copper on steel | 0.36 | 0.53 |\n| teflon on teflon | 0.04 | |\nthe coefficient for static friction is always less than for kinetic friction\nthey are the same for all materials\nthe coefficient for static friction is always greater than for kinetic friction

Answer

Explanation:

Step1: Analyze the table values

For each material - pair in the table, compare the static and kinetic friction coefficients. For example, for rubber on concrete (dry), static is 0.90 and kinetic is 0.68; for rubber on asphalt (dry), static is 0.85 and kinetic is 0.67 etc.

Step2: Determine the general trend

In all cases shown in the table, the static - friction coefficient is greater than the kinetic - friction coefficient.

Answer:

The coefficient for static friction is always greater than for kinetic friction