the 25th anniversary of the clean water act\nby vice president al gore\nin this 1997 speech, vice president…

the 25th anniversary of the clean water act\nby vice president al gore\nin this 1997 speech, vice president al gore reflects on the legacy of the clean water act. the act, passed in 1972, aimed to reduce the effects of pollution on the nations waterways, as well as to establish standards to make our water clean and safe. but the act was also important for raising awareness for many americans of the consequences of water pollution.\n(1) we remember a time when the potomac river was choked with algae. when lake erie was dying. when too many coastal waters were fouled. when too many urban rivers and beaches were open season. when too many rural communities didnt have clean, safe water they could depend on.\n(2) twenty - five years ago today, america had a change of heart - and a change of course. instead of polluting our waters, we decided to clean them. since the passage of the clean water act, we have shipped billions of pounds of pollution from flowing into the rivers, lakes, and streams, and decided the minimum of safety for swimming and fishing.\n(3) this change of heart was homegrown by our people. people like vicki dummer of the ohio environmental council. vicki grew up in the cleveland area and remembers the cuyahoga river catching fire. for most of her adult life she has worked to clean up and restore the cuyahoga and other rivers and, as a health professional, she has educated young children affected by lead pollution. now shes working on a pollution prevention project with businesses located along ohio rivers - finding cost - effective ways to prevent pollution, and sharing them with smaller businesses.\n(4) because of people like vicki, the cuyahoga river has been revitalized, the harbor where it meets lake erie is alive with boats and tourists, and lake erie itself is now home to a $600 million fishing industry.\n(5) but problems persist. for all our success, there are still dangerous run - offs of toxins and pollutants into our streams. communities that dont have the knowledge or the resources to protect their water regions where the wrong kind of development threatens our hard - won progress.\n(6) first, we need to do more to protect the public health. people shouldnt have to worry about whether the water they drink is safe, or whether the fish in our waters can be served to our children.\n(7) second, we must do more to prevent polluted runoff from contaminating our waters. the recent outbreaks of pfiesteria in maryland, virginia, and other states demonstrates just how critical this is, and how much more we must do to fully protect our water.\n(8) third, we need comprehensive approach to water quality - one which brings together all levels of government, and concerned members of our communities, to share ideas and approaches, to pool resources, and to develop a truly comprehensive strategy to safeguard our water.\n(9) this is not the first time we have extended this invitation to congress. in president clintons first term, we spelled out our principles for strengthening the clean water act. our principles were right then, and theyre right now - especially when it comes to controlling non - point source pollution. unfortunately, the 104th congress went in the opposite direction - advancing legislation that was rightly called the \dirty water bill,\ and would have weakened the law, reversed our gains, and fouled our water. how both houses are considering so - called \property rights\ legislation that would hurt state and local efforts to protect water quality. we ask members of congress, in honor of 25 years of re - establishing national support for clean water, to abandon these dubious bills on property rights, and instead take up bills that protect our clean water rights. we urge congress, as they act to passing the safe drinking water act last year, to strengthen and reauthorize the clean water act.\n(10) our joint action on this issue - as much as any other - will test the moral character of our country. an old scriptural passage asks, \who among you, if your children ask bread, will you give them a stone, or if they ask a fish, will you give them a serpent?\\n(11) we might also ask, who among you, if your children ask for fish, will you give them a contaminated fish; if your children ask for water, will you give them unclean water? you see, protecting our water is one of the deepest obligations we have - to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.\nselect the correct answer from the drop - down menu.\nread the excerpt from paragraphs 10 and 11.\nour joint action on this issue - as much as any other - will test the moral character of our country. an old scriptural passage asks, \who among you, if your children ask bread, will you give them a stone, or if they ask a fish, will you give them a serpent?\\nwe might also ask, who among you, if your children ask for fish, will you give them a contaminated fish; if your children ask for water, will you give them unclean water? you see, protecting our water is one of the deepest obligations we have - to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.\nwhat point of view does gore convey in this excerpt?\ngore believes that\npeople should be encouraged to share food and water with one another\npeople have an important ethical responsibility to keep water clean\nclean water is a more pressing concern than clean air for most people\neffective environmental policy requires strong leadership above all

the 25th anniversary of the clean water act\nby vice president al gore\nin this 1997 speech, vice president al gore reflects on the legacy of the clean water act. the act, passed in 1972, aimed to reduce the effects of pollution on the nations waterways, as well as to establish standards to make our water clean and safe. but the act was also important for raising awareness for many americans of the consequences of water pollution.\n(1) we remember a time when the potomac river was choked with algae. when lake erie was dying. when too many coastal waters were fouled. when too many urban rivers and beaches were open season. when too many rural communities didnt have clean, safe water they could depend on.\n(2) twenty - five years ago today, america had a change of heart - and a change of course. instead of polluting our waters, we decided to clean them. since the passage of the clean water act, we have shipped billions of pounds of pollution from flowing into the rivers, lakes, and streams, and decided the minimum of safety for swimming and fishing.\n(3) this change of heart was homegrown by our people. people like vicki dummer of the ohio environmental council. vicki grew up in the cleveland area and remembers the cuyahoga river catching fire. for most of her adult life she has worked to clean up and restore the cuyahoga and other rivers and, as a health professional, she has educated young children affected by lead pollution. now shes working on a pollution prevention project with businesses located along ohio rivers - finding cost - effective ways to prevent pollution, and sharing them with smaller businesses.\n(4) because of people like vicki, the cuyahoga river has been revitalized, the harbor where it meets lake erie is alive with boats and tourists, and lake erie itself is now home to a $600 million fishing industry.\n(5) but problems persist. for all our success, there are still dangerous run - offs of toxins and pollutants into our streams. communities that dont have the knowledge or the resources to protect their water regions where the wrong kind of development threatens our hard - won progress.\n(6) first, we need to do more to protect the public health. people shouldnt have to worry about whether the water they drink is safe, or whether the fish in our waters can be served to our children.\n(7) second, we must do more to prevent polluted runoff from contaminating our waters. the recent outbreaks of pfiesteria in maryland, virginia, and other states demonstrates just how critical this is, and how much more we must do to fully protect our water.\n(8) third, we need comprehensive approach to water quality - one which brings together all levels of government, and concerned members of our communities, to share ideas and approaches, to pool resources, and to develop a truly comprehensive strategy to safeguard our water.\n(9) this is not the first time we have extended this invitation to congress. in president clintons first term, we spelled out our principles for strengthening the clean water act. our principles were right then, and theyre right now - especially when it comes to controlling non - point source pollution. unfortunately, the 104th congress went in the opposite direction - advancing legislation that was rightly called the \dirty water bill,\ and would have weakened the law, reversed our gains, and fouled our water. how both houses are considering so - called \property rights\ legislation that would hurt state and local efforts to protect water quality. we ask members of congress, in honor of 25 years of re - establishing national support for clean water, to abandon these dubious bills on property rights, and instead take up bills that protect our clean water rights. we urge congress, as they act to passing the safe drinking water act last year, to strengthen and reauthorize the clean water act.\n(10) our joint action on this issue - as much as any other - will test the moral character of our country. an old scriptural passage asks, \who among you, if your children ask bread, will you give them a stone, or if they ask a fish, will you give them a serpent?\\n(11) we might also ask, who among you, if your children ask for fish, will you give them a contaminated fish; if your children ask for water, will you give them unclean water? you see, protecting our water is one of the deepest obligations we have - to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.\nselect the correct answer from the drop - down menu.\nread the excerpt from paragraphs 10 and 11.\nour joint action on this issue - as much as any other - will test the moral character of our country. an old scriptural passage asks, \who among you, if your children ask bread, will you give them a stone, or if they ask a fish, will you give them a serpent?\\nwe might also ask, who among you, if your children ask for fish, will you give them a contaminated fish; if your children ask for water, will you give them unclean water? you see, protecting our water is one of the deepest obligations we have - to ourselves, to our children, and to our future.\nwhat point of view does gore convey in this excerpt?\ngore believes that\npeople should be encouraged to share food and water with one another\npeople have an important ethical responsibility to keep water clean\nclean water is a more pressing concern than clean air for most people\neffective environmental policy requires strong leadership above all

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The excerpt mentions protecting water as a moral obligation to ourselves, children, and the future. It uses rhetorical questions about giving contaminated fish or unclean water to children to emphasize the ethical responsibility of keeping water clean.

Answer:

people have an important ethical responsibility to keep water clean