according to the ruling in new york times v. united states, which best describes what the government had to…

according to the ruling in new york times v. united states, which best describes what the government had to prove for its censorship of the new york times to have been acceptable?\nthe articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.\nthe articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military.\nthe articles would have had to reveal classified information.\nthe articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

according to the ruling in new york times v. united states, which best describes what the government had to prove for its censorship of the new york times to have been acceptable?\nthe articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.\nthe articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military.\nthe articles would have had to reveal classified information.\nthe articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In the New York Times v. United States case, the government's censorship of the press would be acceptable only if the articles indisputably threatened national security. This is a high - bar standard set to balance freedom of the press and national security interests.

Answer:

The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.