according to the ruling in new york times v. united states, which best describes what the government had to…

according to the ruling in new york times v. united states, which best describes what the government had to prove for its censorship of the new york times to have been acceptable? the articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security. the articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military. the articles would have had to reveal classified information. the articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

according to the ruling in new york times v. united states, which best describes what the government had to prove for its censorship of the new york times to have been acceptable? the articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security. the articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military. the articles would have had to reveal classified information. the articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

Answer

Answer:

The articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.

Brief Explanations:

In New York Times v. United States, the high - bar for government censorship was that the articles must clearly and without doubt pose a threat to national security. Other options do not meet the strict standard set by the ruling.