which of these actions best illustrates a judge using precedent?\nreviewing the facts of a case before…

which of these actions best illustrates a judge using precedent?\nreviewing the facts of a case before ruling\nformulating an opinion on the guilt of the defendant\nstudying past cases for similarities to the current case\nwriting an opinion brief

which of these actions best illustrates a judge using precedent?\nreviewing the facts of a case before ruling\nformulating an opinion on the guilt of the defendant\nstudying past cases for similarities to the current case\nwriting an opinion brief

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Precedent in law refers to previous court - decisions that are used as a guide for deciding similar current cases. Studying past cases for similarities to the current case is using precedent. Reviewing facts and formulating an opinion on guilt are normal parts of the judicial process but not specifically using precedent. Writing an opinion brief is also a part of the judicial process but not directly related to using precedent.

Answer:

studying past cases for similarities to the current case