anti-federalists argued that branches of government would keep each other in balance. the constitution would…

anti-federalists argued that branches of government would keep each other in balance. the constitution would make states less powerful. the constitution would create a republican government. a republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

anti-federalists argued that branches of government would keep each other in balance. the constitution would make states less powerful. the constitution would create a republican government. a republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Anti - Federalists were concerned about the balance of power between the federal government and the states. They feared that a strong central government (as proposed by the Constitution) would undermine the power of the states. The idea of branches of government keeping each other in balance was more of a Federalist argument (related to the system of checks and balances). The creation of a Republican government was a goal that both Federalists and Anti - Federalists (to some extent, as they also believed in a form of representative government) might have seen as a result of the Constitution, but it was not the main Anti - Federalist concern. The statement about a Republic protecting people from government and each other was more of a general principle of republicanism rather than a specific Anti - Federalist argument against the Constitution.

Answer:

the Constitution would make states less powerful.