which of these arguments might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws?\nfinance laws…
which of these arguments might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws?\nfinance laws violate the right to free speech.\nwealthy people have earned the right to make big campaign donations.\na corporation should be free to support whomever it wishes.\ncorporations and labor unions have too much power.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
- The argument "Finance laws violate the right to free speech" is against campaign finance laws.
- The idea that "Wealthy people have earned the right to make big campaign donations" also opposes strict laws as it supports large - scale donations without regulation.
- "A corporation should be free to support whomever it wishes" is in favor of no restrictions on corporate support, which is contrary to strict campaign finance laws.
- "Corporations and labor unions have too much power" implies that there is a need to limit their influence (which can be done through campaign finance laws), so this is an argument that could be used by a supporter of strict campaign finance laws.
Answer:
Corporations and labor unions have too much power.