is the bridge (in bold) strong or weak? americas founding fathers recognized the value of exploration…

is the bridge (in bold) strong or weak? americas founding fathers recognized the value of exploration, sending men and women on journeys to discover new lands. today, however, there are far fewer uncharted areas left to discover on earth. explorers must therefore turn to new worlds for untouched land. the federal government should therefore invest funds toward starting human settlements on mars.

is the bridge (in bold) strong or weak? americas founding fathers recognized the value of exploration, sending men and women on journeys to discover new lands. today, however, there are far fewer uncharted areas left to discover on earth. explorers must therefore turn to new worlds for untouched land. the federal government should therefore invest funds toward starting human settlements on mars.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The bridge between the idea that explorers need new worlds (due to lack of uncharted areas on Earth) and the conclusion that the federal government should invest in Mars settlements is weak. Just because explorers need new areas doesn't directly mean the government should specifically invest in Mars - there are other possible new - world exploration options, and no specific reasons are given for Mars over others. Also, no economic, technological, or social - impact justifications are provided for the government investment.

Answer:

Weak