in the case gitlow v. new york, gitlow argued\nthat his first amendment rights were being violated.\nthat he…

in the case gitlow v. new york, gitlow argued\nthat his first amendment rights were being violated.\nthat he couldnt be convicted of the same crime twice.\nthat his sixth amendment rights guaranteed him the right to a jury.\nthat he couldnt be jailed without being charged with a crime.

in the case gitlow v. new york, gitlow argued\nthat his first amendment rights were being violated.\nthat he couldnt be convicted of the same crime twice.\nthat his sixth amendment rights guaranteed him the right to a jury.\nthat he couldnt be jailed without being charged with a crime.

Answer

Answer:

that his First Amendment rights were being violated.

Brief Explanations:

In Gitlow v. New York, Gitlow claimed First - Amendment free - speech rights violation. The case dealt with the application of free - speech protections to the states.