changing views on equal access\nwhich statement represents the key difference between the courts view of…

changing views on equal access\nwhich statement represents the key difference between the courts view of equal access in plessy and its view in regents?\nthe court shifted from opposing legal segregation to supporting it.\nthe court shifted from saying that segregation was legal to saying that any laws made based on race would be subject to careful judicial scrutiny.\nthe court shifted from arguing that african americans were entitled to legal protection to arguing that they were not.\nthe court shifted from actively discouraging racial segregation to actively encouraging it.

changing views on equal access\nwhich statement represents the key difference between the courts view of equal access in plessy and its view in regents?\nthe court shifted from opposing legal segregation to supporting it.\nthe court shifted from saying that segregation was legal to saying that any laws made based on race would be subject to careful judicial scrutiny.\nthe court shifted from arguing that african americans were entitled to legal protection to arguing that they were not.\nthe court shifted from actively discouraging racial segregation to actively encouraging it.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme - Court established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which made segregation legal. In later cases like Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the Court began to subject race - based laws to more careful judicial scrutiny. The other options are incorrect as the Court did not oppose segregation in Plessy, did not shift from arguing for African - American legal protection to against it, and did not shift from discouraging to encouraging segregation.

Answer:

The Court shifted from saying that segregation was legal to saying that any laws made based on race would be subject to careful judicial scrutiny.