which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be…

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18?\nsome 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them.\nsome 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone.\nchanging the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.\nchanging the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16.

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18?\nsome 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them.\nsome 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone.\nchanging the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.\nchanging the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16.

Answer

Answer:

Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.

Brief Explanations:

This claim directly links raising the age to a significant benefit (safer roads) based on the higher accident - rate of less - experienced drivers, strengthening the argument for the change.