which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be…

which claim is the most effective for the argument that the minimum age to get a drivers license should be changed to 18?\no some 16 - year - olds help out by driving their younger siblings to school, so changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be a problem for them.\no some 16 - year - olds are mature enough to drive, but changing the minimum driving age to 18 would be an overall benefit for everyone.\no changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.\no changing the minimum driving age to 18 shouldnt cause too much of a problem, because its only two years older than 16.
Answer
Brief Explanations:
A strong argument for raising the driving - age to 18 should focus on safety benefits. The first option is an argument against the change. The second option is a weak argument as it acknowledges some 16 - year - olds are mature. The fourth option downplays the significance of the age change. The third option directly links raising the age to safer roads by reducing less - experienced drivers, which is a compelling reason.
Answer:
Changing the minimum driving age to 18 would mean safer roads for everyone, since less - experienced drivers are more likely to have accidents.