coaches other than the ones assigned to the passenger train to assign each passenger to a compartment other…

coaches other than the ones assigned to the passenger train to assign each passenger to a compartment other than the one set aside for them; and imposing fines or imprisonment for refusing to carry on the train power to refuse to carry on the train passengers assigned to them, and exempting the railway company from provisions either of the thirteenth amendment or of the fourteenth amendment of the united states. which best explains why the supreme courts decision? the supreme courts ruling allowed states to deny equal protection. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for segregation, it could not be applied. the supreme courts decision gave individual states the freedom to discriminate against people of color. since segregation laws did not provide equal protection or liberty, they were not in line with the 14th amendment.
Answer
Breve explicación:
La pregunta se refiere a una decisión de la Corte Suprema relacionada con leyes de segregación y enmienda constitucional. Las leyes de segregación que discriminaban a las personas de color no cumplían con los estándares de igualdad establecidos por la 14ª enmienda, que garantiza la igualdad legal y protección.
Respuesta:
Dado que las leyes de segregación no proporcionaban protección o libertades iguales, no estaban de acuerdo con la 14ª enmienda.