consider this claim: dogs are peoples best friends, so they should be allowed in all public places. now…

consider this claim: dogs are peoples best friends, so they should be allowed in all public places. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the strongest and most reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? some dog breeds, such as dalmatians and poodles, are generally better suited than others to a workplace environment. not all dogs are friendly and well - behaved, and not all people like them, so there should be dog - free public places for everyone to enjoy. rabies is a massive concern among dog owners, so for the sake of health and safety, dogs need to be banned from public places.

consider this claim: dogs are peoples best friends, so they should be allowed in all public places. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the strongest and most reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? some dog breeds, such as dalmatians and poodles, are generally better suited than others to a workplace environment. not all dogs are friendly and well - behaved, and not all people like them, so there should be dog - free public places for everyone to enjoy. rabies is a massive concern among dog owners, so for the sake of health and safety, dogs need to be banned from public places.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first option only addresses workplace - suitability of some breeds and not a general counter - argument. The third option overstates with the mention of rabies as a sole reason for a complete ban. The second option acknowledges that not all dogs are well - behaved and not all people like them, providing a more balanced and reasonable counter - claim to the idea that dogs should be allowed in all public places.

Answer:

Not all dogs are friendly and well - behaved, and not all people like them, so there should be dog - free public places for everyone to enjoy.