consider this claim: between hawaii and alaska, hawaii is the better state for an active outdoor vacation…

consider this claim: between hawaii and alaska, hawaii is the better state for an active outdoor vacation. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? though its the largest of all fifty states, alaska has a lower population than hawaii, so the cities arent as crowded. alaska has glaciers and mountains to explore, and it gets a lot of daylight in the summer, so there is more time to enjoy being outside.

consider this claim: between hawaii and alaska, hawaii is the better state for an active outdoor vacation. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? though its the largest of all fifty states, alaska has a lower population than hawaii, so the cities arent as crowded. alaska has glaciers and mountains to explore, and it gets a lot of daylight in the summer, so there is more time to enjoy being outside.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The claim is about Hawaii being better for an active - outdoor vacation. The first statement focuses on population and crowd - ness, which is not directly related to active outdoor activities. The second statement mentions glaciers, mountains, and more daylight for outdoor enjoyment, which are directly related to active outdoor vacations and thus presents a stronger counter - claim.

Answer:

Alaska has glaciers and mountains to explore, and it gets a lot of daylight in the summer, so there is more time to enjoy being outside.