consider this claim: snakes make great pets because they are clean, low - maintenance animals. now consider…

consider this claim: snakes make great pets because they are clean, low - maintenance animals. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim? snakes do not make good pets because they do not form strong emotional bonds with people the way dogs and cats do. snakes are too dangerous to keep as pets because cobras and rattlesnakes have deadly, venomous bites.

consider this claim: snakes make great pets because they are clean, low - maintenance animals. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counterclaim to the above claim? snakes do not make good pets because they do not form strong emotional bonds with people the way dogs and cats do. snakes are too dangerous to keep as pets because cobras and rattlesnakes have deadly, venomous bites.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first counter - claim focuses on the lack of emotional bonds, which is a common concern for pet - owners. The second counter - claim is about the danger of specific venomous snakes, but not all snakes are venomous. The first one is more general and reasonable for arguing against snakes as great pets.

Answer:

Snakes do not make good pets because they do not form strong emotional bonds with people the way dogs and cats do.