consider this claim: the united states should convert to the metric system, as almost all other countries…

consider this claim: the united states should convert to the metric system, as almost all other countries have. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? it would be too time - consuming and disruptive to convert to the metric system, given the sheer breadth of things that would have to be changed. it would be tremendously expensive to convert to the metric system, so converting would spell financial disaster for the united states.

consider this claim: the united states should convert to the metric system, as almost all other countries have. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? it would be too time - consuming and disruptive to convert to the metric system, given the sheer breadth of things that would have to be changed. it would be tremendously expensive to convert to the metric system, so converting would spell financial disaster for the united states.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first counter - claim about time - consuming and disruptive nature is more reasonable as it focuses on the practical difficulties of a large - scale change. The second claim about financial disaster is an extreme exaggeration.

Answer:

It would be too time - consuming and disruptive to convert to the metric system, given the sheer breadth of things that would have to be changed.