consider this claim: veggie burgers are every bit as tasty and satisfying as regular beef burgers. now…

consider this claim: veggie burgers are every bit as tasty and satisfying as regular beef burgers. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? veggie burgers have no taste whatsoever and cannot compare in any way to a delicious beef burger. regular beef burgers have more good - tasting fat and filling protein than veggie burgers.

consider this claim: veggie burgers are every bit as tasty and satisfying as regular beef burgers. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? veggie burgers have no taste whatsoever and cannot compare in any way to a delicious beef burger. regular beef burgers have more good - tasting fat and filling protein than veggie burgers.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first counter - claim is extreme and subjective ("no taste whatsoever"). The second counter - claim provides a more reasonable and objective comparison based on the presence of fat and protein in beef burgers compared to veggie burgers.

Answer:

Regular beef burgers have more good - tasting fat and filling protein than veggie burgers.