consider this claim: veggie burgers are every bit as tasty and satisfying as regular beef burgers. now…

consider this claim: veggie burgers are every bit as tasty and satisfying as regular beef burgers. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? regular beef burgers have more good - tasting fat and filling protein than veggie burgers. veggie burgers have no taste whatsoever and cannot compare in any way to a delicious beef burger.

consider this claim: veggie burgers are every bit as tasty and satisfying as regular beef burgers. now consider how someone might argue against this. which sentence presents the stronger and more reasonable counter - claim to the above claim? regular beef burgers have more good - tasting fat and filling protein than veggie burgers. veggie burgers have no taste whatsoever and cannot compare in any way to a delicious beef burger.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

The first counter - claim provides a more reasonable and measured argument by pointing out a factual difference (more good - tasting fat and filling protein in beef burgers). The second counter - claim is an extreme and less reasonable statement as it says veggie burgers have no taste at all.

Answer:

Regular beef burgers have more good - tasting fat and filling protein than veggie burgers.