when a court interprets laws in a way that creates or promotes social change and wrestles with moral issues…

when a court interprets laws in a way that creates or promotes social change and wrestles with moral issues, it is engaging in judicial\nrestraint.\nreview.\nactivism.\nprecedent.

when a court interprets laws in a way that creates or promotes social change and wrestles with moral issues, it is engaging in judicial\nrestraint.\nreview.\nactivism.\nprecedent.

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Judicial activism is when courts interpret laws to bring about social change and deal with moral issues. Judicial restraint is the opposite, being more conservative in interpretation. Judicial review is the power to review laws for constitutionality. Precedent refers to past court - decisions guiding future ones.

Answer:

C. activism