when deciding cases, justices often look to precedent, or previously decided court cases and opinions that…

when deciding cases, justices often look to precedent, or previously decided court cases and opinions that can serve as a guide for interpreting the law. which of the following court cases could possibly have been a precedent used to decide berkemer v. mccarty (1984)? miranda v. arizona (1966) united states v. garibay (1998) dickerson v. united states (2000) missouri v. seibert (2004)

when deciding cases, justices often look to precedent, or previously decided court cases and opinions that can serve as a guide for interpreting the law. which of the following court cases could possibly have been a precedent used to decide berkemer v. mccarty (1984)? miranda v. arizona (1966) united states v. garibay (1998) dickerson v. united states (2000) missouri v. seibert (2004)

Answer

Brief Explanations:

Precedent refers to previously decided court cases. For a case to be a precedent for Berkemer v. McCarty (1984), it must have been decided before 1984. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) was decided before 1984, while United States v. Garibay (1998), Dickerson v. United States (2000), and Missouri v. Seibert (2004) were all decided after 1984.

Answer:

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)