which details from the myths support the conclusion that both cultures value children? being aggressive…

which details from the myths support the conclusion that both cultures value children? being aggressive toward parents children having a role in creation a child being god of forests a child misbehaving raven becoming a baby stars being created supports conclusion does not support conclusion

which details from the myths support the conclusion that both cultures value children? being aggressive toward parents children having a role in creation a child being god of forests a child misbehaving raven becoming a baby stars being created supports conclusion does not support conclusion

Answer

Brief Explanations:

  • "being aggressive toward parents" shows disrespect, not valuing children.
  • "children having a role in creation" implies they are important and valued.
  • "a child being god of forests" gives a high - status role, indicating value.
  • "a child misbehaving" is neutral about valuing children.
  • "Raven becoming a baby" may suggest a significance placed on the baby/child form.
  • "stars being created" has no relation to valuing children.

Answer:

Supports Conclusion: children having a role in creation, a child being god of forests, Raven becoming a baby Does Not Support Conclusion: being aggressive toward parents, a child misbehaving, stars being created